Alice is based
on a real young girl who was a friend of Lewis Carroll. The chapter started
with the caterpillar looks at Alice and poses, "Who are you?" to
which Alice answers she no longer truly knows anymore, after all the new
changes. She tells him how puzzling it can be to change size several occasions
in one day, but the caterpillar basically disagrees, and argues that even
transforming into a butterfly would feel in the least strange for him. Their
discussion continues with complexity, since the Caterpillar speaks only in
brief, rational sentences and is rather unkind. Alice argues that she is
changing, and doesn't memorize things as she used to. To prove this, she tries
reciting a poem, however, it comes out just as incorrectly as the verses in wonderland
do, and is filled of mean and nasty comedy.
Alice's
Adventures in Wonderland is a simple story of little girl that has a little
problem with her identity when read. However, after thinking about it deeply,
and trying to imagine the form of these kinds of problems in the real world and
among the societies in nowadays, too many critical issues that comes in mind.
For instance, the girl in the story, that called Alice, got confused each time because she is not sure who is her, what makes her confused about her identity. As well as in many societies, in the real world, too many people are confused about their identity because they are not sure about their origins and their ancestors’ identity, nationality, language, traditions, etc.
The big question on those peoples’ mind is “do I go with the flow, follow and change as the people around or I try to stuck with the things that are supposed to be a part of my origins?”
For instance, the girl in the story, that called Alice, got confused each time because she is not sure who is her, what makes her confused about her identity. As well as in many societies, in the real world, too many people are confused about their identity because they are not sure about their origins and their ancestors’ identity, nationality, language, traditions, etc.
The big question on those peoples’ mind is “do I go with the flow, follow and change as the people around or I try to stuck with the things that are supposed to be a part of my origins?”
Now,
for example, if those people keep thinking and worrying about what are their
real language or their real traditions what could be the result?
The first possible scenario is that those people will waste a huge energy on finding out something that is never sure. The second one is that those people will just adapt to the environment that are born in, and try to improve it.
In this situation, which is very general and common, as well, the second scenario would be the best. First, because the amount of energy that those people would allocate to find out about their origin, traditions, and who are their ancestors and what were they doing could be allocated to other studies or researches that could help the world get better. Second, suppose if everyone find out about his origins, language and traditions. The result would be a greater discrimination among people, more difficulties to communicate and to understand each other, and it would be strongly probable that the rate of development and improvement of the societies would be smaller, since there would be fewer corporations because everyone would try to deal with his life with his own traditions.
Therefore, based on these logical examples that shows a tradeoff between some curiosity and a better, homogenous world, there is no real need to worry that much about how ones’ origins were. Even though people change, the world change and everything change. Everyone could identify him self by how well he adapted to his world and then how well he participated in making out of it a better place for the next generations to be adapted with. With this manner, people won’t need to know themselves and identify them by what or who were their ancestors. People will recognize each other and identify each other by the behavior, the achievements, and the added value that each one is giving to his society.
The first possible scenario is that those people will waste a huge energy on finding out something that is never sure. The second one is that those people will just adapt to the environment that are born in, and try to improve it.
In this situation, which is very general and common, as well, the second scenario would be the best. First, because the amount of energy that those people would allocate to find out about their origin, traditions, and who are their ancestors and what were they doing could be allocated to other studies or researches that could help the world get better. Second, suppose if everyone find out about his origins, language and traditions. The result would be a greater discrimination among people, more difficulties to communicate and to understand each other, and it would be strongly probable that the rate of development and improvement of the societies would be smaller, since there would be fewer corporations because everyone would try to deal with his life with his own traditions.
Therefore, based on these logical examples that shows a tradeoff between some curiosity and a better, homogenous world, there is no real need to worry that much about how ones’ origins were. Even though people change, the world change and everything change. Everyone could identify him self by how well he adapted to his world and then how well he participated in making out of it a better place for the next generations to be adapted with. With this manner, people won’t need to know themselves and identify them by what or who were their ancestors. People will recognize each other and identify each other by the behavior, the achievements, and the added value that each one is giving to his society.
No comments:
Post a Comment